Tag Archives: questions

HST101.WI12.MW: Islam Questions

This is a message for my MW sections of HST 101. If you are in the T section, ignore this.

After looking again over the primary sources from Strayer Ch.11 (Doc.11.1, Doc.11.2, and Doc.11.3), please respond to the following question prompts in a comment below:

1) What attitudes toward Jews, Christians, and other non-Muslim peoples do these primary source selections suggest on the part of Islam?

2) What do you think is the relationship between the selections from the Koran (Doc.11.1), from the Hadith (Doc.11.2) and from Sharia Law (Doc.11.3)? How do these sources of authority work together to govern Islamic society?

3) After looking at these sources, what sort of problems do you think early Islamic society and empire had?

You do not have to rote-answer each question in turn if you so choose. Feel free to respond in general with a short paragraph or a response to a fellow classmate’s offering. Also, be sure you include your full name and your class section (e.g., MW 3:00), so that it makes it easier for me to give you credit for participating.

2/21 Update: If you do not put an email address in the comment form, you will get the Internal Service Error when trying to post a comment. The emails are not displayed or linked to your comments where anyone but me can see them. It is part of the spam comment management system, nothing more.

HST203.SU11: Thursday’s Class Stuff

I have posted to your course syllabus page the Reader Response Questions and the PowerPoint slides for class on Thursday, dealing with the comparison of Imperial Rome and Han Dynasty China. Apologies for the slight delay in the RRQs. Let me know if you have any questions.

HST101.WI11: Critical Questions for Monday (1/17/11)

For Monday’s class (17 January 2011), please read the assigned chapter in your Strayer text (Ch.3) and the short reading extract I have posted to Blackboard  (*shudder*), a piece on “Cities and Civilizations” by Kevin Reilly.  Please be prepared to discuss the following questions when you come to class on Monday:

1) What are some examples of items, classes, ideas, and so on created in the first cities?  So then what aspects or characteristics denote civilization, as distinct from Neolithic settlements like Jericho or Çatal Höyük?

2) What role did geography play in the development of society and culture in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt?

We will not be discussing the primary source readings (listed on your syllabus) until Wednesday’s class.  Ping me in Twitter, email, or my office hours if you have a question about this.

HST203.FA10: Macedonian Phalanx

I received this through the Comment Form and thought I would answer it briefly for those interested.

Since the battle techniques of the Macedonian Phalanx did not leave it very mobile, why weren’t they outflanked on a consistent basis by their opponents?

The key here is to understand that throughout history most every kind of infantry formation is susceptible to flanking.  Armies in the Hellenistic Period were no exception to this.  In a style of warfare where everyone is using the same tactics, the weaknesses of the phalanx aren’t as readily apparent.  For example, you need to keep the entire line moving in unison or gaps open up which allow an enemy to push through and flank a unit in the line; this becomes harder to do on on rough terrain, so the optimum terrain for phalanx war was flat ground.  Hellenistic armies also used cavalry to protect their broader flanks or attack the enemy flanks (Alexander did this to great effect, usually sending elite infantry units, the hypaspists, into the gap made by the cavalry breaking through an enemy’s wing).  Here, take a look at this:

What eventually supplanted the phalanx style of war in the Mediterranean was the Roman Maniple System, which was much more maneuverable and flexible than the massed Greek phalanx.  You can see a basic representation of this here (ganked from Mike Anderson’s Ancient History Blog):

Roman Maniple SystemPing me in the comments if you still have questions.

HST102.FA10: Questions on Topic #5

Once again, I did the One-Minute Paper assessment last week, this time for Topic #5: La Patrie: War and Society in Revolutionary Europe, 1789-1815.  As part of this, I asked you to ask any questions you had at the bottom of the sheet. Here are a few I think need more direct answers.

What of this will be most important to help us on a exam?

All of it or else I wouldn’t present it to you. That said, I would also check out the Exam I Study Guide, which you can find on your course page under Classes in the navigation bar above to see what I have particularly singled out for special interest.

My question is how can we bring all that we learned into a certain timeline so that we can put the history of many different topics together?

This is a good question.  I think the best way to approach this is to craft your own timeline, a task which will help you internalize the chronology more.  Take the French Revolution stuff we’ve been doing, which I had essentially stretched out over four different topics.  Take the various periods of the conflict that I laid out for you at the beginning (e.g., Aristocratic Revolt, 1787-1789; Bourgeois Revolt, May-July 1789; Workers/Peasants Revolt, July-August 1789; Towards Constitutional Monarchy, August 1789-August 1792; and so on) and then start placing the various key events and figures we’ve talked about in their right period (e.g., the October Days, the Flight to Varennes, the Battle of Jemappes, and so on).  This will take a little work on your part, but that’s learning.  One new fangled method you might want to try is something I stumbled across in the summer, but haven’t played around with yet.  It’s called Timetoast, and it’s a website that allows you to craft your own personalized timelines. I might use this in the future for classes, but I can see students getting some benefit on their own in crafting study materials.  Play around with it and let me know how it works.

If one nation came out with guns before the other wouldn’t they dominate the other countries?

A couple of people asked variations of this question.  Short answer: yes.  But also keep in mind that the emergence of such weaponry spurred others to compete as well (an arms race really; nothing ever changes). Change of Die as they say…

How exactly did Napoleon Bonaparte get defeated?  Wad the new military tactics and methods part of the reason he got defeated?

Short answer: yes.  Other European powers started adopting Napoleonic tactics in an effort to even the playing field against him.  And while Napoleon was a great general, he was a bit more human when his enemies fought like him.  His own hubris was also a large component of the equation.  It also helped that at Waterloo he was fighting two different Allied armies (the British under the Duke of Wellington and the Prussians under Blücher) over a three day engagement, with the timely arrival of the Prussians turning the tide.

The last isn’t a question as it is a comment that calls for a response.

The [PowerPoints] need more information.  I don’t know what to be writing down.  So much information.

Good note-taking is a learned ability that one must work at.  It isn’t something that just happens because anyone and everyone can write crap down.  There are a number of places online that discuss various strategies for good note-taking, but this one at Stepcase Lifehack has some good advice (there are others, like this handout from Dartmouth’s Academic Skills Center).  The mixture of materials we use in class (outlines, lecture, discussion, PowerPoints with images, maps, and so forth) is designed to appeal to as broad a swath of students as possible, with all the different learning styles involved therein.  But what I refuse to do is overload my PowerPoint slides with shitloads of text and then effectively read the slides to you.  I mean, what would the point be then?  Give some of the strategies linked above a try and see if that helps.

If you have any questions on this, ping me in the comments below.

HST102.FA10: Questions on Topic #2

Last week, I asked you to provide me with a brief synopsis of what you believe were the important points of our discussion on the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. Along with that, I asked you to write any questions you had on the bottom of the sheet you turned it. Below is a few of the questions that came up and my answers.

Do you want important dates to be memorized for tests?

Generally speaking, if I make a big deal out of a date in class, then yes, you should know the date, what happened then, and why it is important.

Which of the important old guys should we be sure we know about?

All the ones I mentioned as important in class naturally.

Why weren’t women more involved [in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment]? No interest? Not allowed?

A combination of factors really. Less women of the time had access to the education necessary to participate in these intellectual movements, as well as the systemic misogyny built into European society at the time. Your text discusses some of the few women, like Margarat Cavendish, who did have some contributions to make to science, and we did also go over in class the role aristocratic women like Madame Geoffrin played in the salon culture of the French Enlightenment.

Did the monarchs or governments ever take serious action against [the Enlightenment philosophes]?

Yes. Philosophes like Voltaire often spent time in exile due to the work they produced, or rather when the work they produced ran afoul of the censorship regimes run by various European governments. On the other hand, some countries were rather tolerant of burgeoning Enlightenment thought (e.g., Britain or, strangely enough, Prussia under Frederick II the Great).

Had the nobles, priests, and peasants all now been merged? With the new ideas of thinking, had everyone just sort of merged into one mass group (with exception of the leaders)?

No. The mass of people throughout Europe were not impacted in the slightest by the ideas of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. They were still in their own, closed-off, semi-medieval worlds. Only when those isolated worlds got disrupted by big events (e.g., the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, etc) did these ideas start to spread extensively.

Let me know in the comments if you have further questions.